From FOMS 2013

Main: WebRTC

WebRTC

Feedback from the participants:

that are build around that idea; having an simple url will simplify a throw away a lot of the flexibility

very simple to an implementor by referring to a simple URL scheme

Pain-points for WebRTC from the participants:

recover from that

multi-layer structure)

(it's unfortunate, nobody actual enjoys the SDP that is in WebRTC) (maybe most of the people would have done it differently now?)

the developers to not know anything about SDP

https://npmjs.org/package/sdp-transform ?

objects it's not necessarily that you get what you want

through a browser

WebRTC and text tracks?

can be done today easily

WebRTC states about other browsers:

the nix port which uses gstreamer and they're working on the WK infrastructure too)

Did the whole Cisco-thing help with the codec-related fight?

to move things forward and toward a resolution

Anything interested that come out of TPAC related to WebRTC:

Retrieved from /foms2013/pmwiki.php/Main/WebRTC
Page last modified on December 01, 2013, at 11:10 PM